Fake Climate Crisis
The case for climate change being exaggerated for power
FACTS:
- Carbon Dioxide accounts for 0.04% of the earth’s atmosphere.
- Human caused carbon dioxide accounts for a heavily debated range of between 5 to 35% of total Atmospheric C02.
- New Zealand accounts for 0.09% of the world’s carbon dioxide (C02) emissions.
->> Question: With 0.9% of up to 35% of 0.04% of the atmosphere that carbon dioxide fills, what justification does New Zealand’s Government and News Media have to push climate alarmism and expensive policies in the name of sacrificing the essential needs of New Zealanders?
TOPICS
Fake Climate Crisis
The Suspicion:
- New Zealand’s Government, Corporate News Media, and Corporate Industry Leaders, are pushing a narrative that man made carbon dioxide emissions are the primary cause of an existential climate threat to humanity.
Data:
- Carbon Dioxide accounts for 0.04% of the earth’s atmosphere.
- Human caused carbon dioxide accounts for a heavily debated range of between 5 to 35% of total Atmospheric C02.
- New Zealand accounts for 0.09% of the world’s carbon dioxide (C02) emissions.
SUMMARY OF NZ’s WORLDWIDE C02 EMISSIONS: New Zealand accounts for 0.09 % of 5-35% of 0.04% of Worldwide Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere.
Questions:
- Why is there so much urgency towards reducing man made C02 emissions in New Zealand if New Zealand accounts for less than 1/10,000th of a percent of total CO2 emissions?
- Who benefits the most (profits the most, gains the most power/influence) if New Zealand adopts a C02 reducing strategy.
- Why are fact checkers biased and why is there no open and balanced public debate?
- What are the risks and costs of implementing policies and strategies aimed at reducing C02?
- Why is New Zealand’s corporate media not pointing any of this out?
- How much are New Zealanders currently paying in taxes and other expenses towards Net ZERO climate policy decisions in New Zealand?
- What other sacrifices will New Zealanders be asked / forced to make in order to meet these (completely unnecessary) Net Zero goals?
ASSERTIONS
Assertion #1: Legacy Media have a heavily one-sided bias that human caused carbon dioxide emissions are causing an existential climate crisis.
Assertion #2: Governments benefit significantly from the increased powers gained and tax revenue collected if Assertion #1 was to be accepted as fact.
Assertion #3: Carbon Dioxide (C02) is a vital ingredient for plant life to survive and thrive.
Assertion 4#: Blaming Carbon Dioxide (C02) and not the Government’s own chemical pollution of the environment is an indictment on the Media’s objectivity and independence to report factual and balanced news.
Assertion #5: Climate policy targeting CO2 is not about protecting the environment. It is an excuse for hijacking control over the population.