Release the Data

Electromagnetic Radiation Poisoning

LATEST UPDATE, 11 JUNE 2025

Tests conducted in the United States compared rural and non-rural areas highlighted the difference in mortality rates between rural states and metropolitan areas, with cities having higher rates of mortality. The data sets showed that there is no excess mortality in the 85+ age group in rural areas, while there is a significant increase in mortality rates in metropolitan areas. These excess deaths coincided with 5G (5th Generation technology) rollouts in city areas.

Link: During the meeting, Dr. Robert Young and Anders Brunstad presented data sets that showed a correlation between excess mortality rates in the United States and 5G electromagnetic microwave radiation frequencies.

No GENUINE long term safety data of effects of high EMF radiation on New Zealanders (or anyone, really):

Current Situation:

New Zealand’s Ministry of Health claim that “Measurements on 5G sites show that exposures are similar to or lower than those from existing cellular technologies” however other studies claim otherwise.

 
How do we ascertain which side is correct?
 
  • Conflicts of Interest

    5G and succeeding technologies are heavily tied to ‘The Internet of Things’ (IOT) which is a technology infrastructure forecast to heavily feature into the government infrastructure plans of all future governments.  

    This will allow people and situations to be analysed and managed in real time. It is the increased bandwidth and hence, radiation, that will allow surveillance technologies to monitor and even control things remotely.

    QUESTION: If 5G and succeeding technology is crucial to the deployment of this infrastructure, would Government institutions be completely honest about potential health effects connected to such technology? 

     
  • Profits to be made

    The amount of money to be generated from this technology by telcos and infrastructure developers like Chorus, Spark, One NZ, and their board members make it very tempting to collate data that softens any particular negative health effects that 5G and succeeding technologies may actually have.  

     
  • Public Consultation:

    5G implementation was never consulted with the general public. It was decided upon in board rooms and back offices. This demonstrates a lack of transparency and disclosure.

     
What should the public’s stance be?
This comes down to informed consent and personal choice. Informed consent cannot, however, be made by the public because negative research findings about 5G have not been shared with the public and / or dismissed by conflicted parties (Government, telcos, media) as irrelevant.
 
Our stance is that all information about 5G technology (positive and negative) should be tabled and public debate must happen openly in order for the parameters of informed public consent to be achievable.