Only 1 in 20 New Zealanders identifies themselves as LGBT or Q, so WHY is such an emphasis on transgender education, for example, happening when only 0.7% of the population identify as such?   

The topic of LGBT education in schools has been the subject of considerable debate.  Some concerns are often centered around the following points:

CONCERNS & RISKS OF GENDER EDUCATION

Gender education damages the family unit by blurring male and female roles

Traditionally men have been the protectors and women the carers of families. Jointly, the mother and father’s deep understanding of their own individual role has allowed them to foster the healthiest environment for young children to grow from.

While some boys are more nurturer and carer, and some girls more hunter and gatherer, that is the exception rather than the norm. These kids should be taken care of, and guided towards their strengths. But to force all kids into entertaining the idea of NOT following their natural instincts  – then you’re contriving ideology into their minds at an age that interrupts their nature, and this creates an environment for stunted growth and confusion, among other things.

Sexual Perversion of Children

Schools have been hosting Drag Queen Singalongs in school libraries and classrooms, and not just men wearing dresses, but men wearing completely sexualised and inappropriate clothing into learning environments.

The persistent allowance of these kinds of people into schools begs the question as to whether school policy makers are doing something that is knowingly harmful to the psychological health of a certain number of children at school?

If so, the next question would be WHY would they be trying to harm the psychological wellbeing of children? It could be to undermine the critical thinking skills of future generations so that populations in the future can be easier controlled. This might sound like a conspiracy theory to some, but to dismiss it as impossible would be deeply negligent.

Age Appropriateness

Should discussions around LGBT be introduced to younger children, and are certain concepts like gender identity or same-sex relationships even necessary for young age groups? Critics argue that children are not ready to understand these topics, and believe it will confuse them or introduce ideas they aren’t ready to deal with. The result could be a child succumbing to a perversion of their own thoughts, leading to decisions and behaviours that they will likely come to regret in the future.

Parental Rights and Consent

Schools are now starting the process of a child’s gender transition without even informing the parents of that child that such a process is taking place. This essentially means that the rights a parent has to oversee their own child’s decisions are being ignored.

On a general note, some parents believe discussions about gender and sexuality should happen in the home, not at schools. They believe they should have the right to control what their children are taught about these topics. Some even push back against laws or policies that might prevent them from opting out of certain lessons, or from being informed about what their children are learning.

Religious or Cultural Beliefs

For some, the concern arises from conflicts with religious or cultural values. Many religious traditions have specific beliefs about marriage, gender, and sexuality, and individuals who hold those beliefs may see LGBT education as inconsistent with their teachings. They worry that such education could undermine or challenge their deeply held beliefs.

Increased Focus on Gender and Identity

Some argue that the growing focus on gender identity and expression might lead to confusion among children, especially those who may not yet have a strong understanding of their own identities. Critics sometimes feel that an emphasis on gender fluidity or diverse sexualities might pressure students to think more about these topics than they are developmentally prepared to handle.

Potential for Bullying or Division

There’s also a concern that certain LGBT topics, while meant to promote inclusion and understanding, could lead to division among students, especially if they are introduced in a way that makes some feel excluded or uncomfortable. Critics worry that teaching about LGBT issues might inadvertently cause more bullying, rather than reduce it.

Political and Ideological Concerns

In some cases, the opposition stems from broader political or ideological divides. Some individuals view the teaching of LGBT topics in schools as part of a larger “agenda” to promote progressive or left-leaning ideals. In this sense, the concern isn’t necessarily about the content itself, but about what it represents in terms of societal values.